Alberta Basic Security Training (ABST) Practice Exam 2025

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $4.99 payment

Study for the Alberta Basic Security Training (ABST) Exam. Study with flashcards and multiple choice questions. With over 500 questions. Updated for 2025. Get ready for your exam!

Practice this question and more.


What is the implication of filing a late complaint against a security professional?

  1. The complaint will be possibly ignored

  2. The complaint will be investigated regardless

  3. It can potentially lead to disciplinary action

  4. It resets the complaint window

The correct answer is: The complaint will be possibly ignored

Filing a late complaint against a security professional often means that the complaint may not be taken into consideration or could be deemed invalid due to the timing of the submission. Regulatory bodies typically have specific timeframes within which a complaint must be filed to ensure effective investigation and resolution. Complaints submitted outside this timeframe may be overlooked, as they can complicate the investigation process or dilute the relevance of the complaint due to the passage of time. Consequently, there is a significant risk that a late complaint will not receive the attention it warrants or might be dismissed altogether, impacting the accountability of the professional involved. On the other hand, while it is true that the complaint may still be investigated regardless of its timing, there is often no obligation for authorities to proceed with inquiries on late submissions. Disciplinary action is generally reserved for situations where a valid and timely complaint is filed, reinforcing the importance of adhering to prescribed timelines. Therefore, the implications of submitting a late complaint are serious and can hinder the process of accountability in the security sector.